Does Buying Apple Gear Turn You Into A Snob?

Monday, 31 March 2008

snob

[with adj.] a person who believes that their tastes in a particular area are superior to those of other people.

A picture of the Apple logo

The question is, does buying Apple gear turn you into a snob? It’s a question that I’ve been thinking about lately. It’s led to me examining my own attitudes and thinking about how they’ve changed over the years.

Anyone who has read my blog lately will know that I love Apple’s products. I’ve blogged often enough about why I like them. I’m now fortunate enough to own four Apple pieces—note the use of the term pieces as if describing art. In order of purchase they are:

  • A 2004 20GB iPod with Click Wheel
  • A 2005 PowerBook G4 12”
  • A 2006 iMac Core 2 Duo 20”
  • A 2007 16GB iPod touch

The Click Wheel iPod was the first Apple product I bought. It was the last iPod before they got colour screens and could display photos. It’s probably the last of that first wave of iPods in the sense that it came with elaborate packaging and lots of accessories, whereas nowadays the packaging is more environmentally friendly and you have to buy things like charging bricks separately. I love the ingenuity of the Click Wheel and the way the backlight fades in and out slowly rather than abruptly.

My 12” PowerBook looks amazing. There’s no clutter or extraneous detail and the underneath looks like something space-age built for NASA for mega bucks. In fact, I was watching the DVD of 2001: A Space Odyssey the other week and I don’t think my PowerBook would look out of place on board the Discovery One, such is the high level of clean detailing.

The iMac is my workhorse but with supermodel looks. There’s so much computer in such a small space. Not having to have a system tower on the floor is liberating. The engineering on the stand hinge that supports the whole computer is stunning.

All I have to say about my iPod touch is that it was sent back in time from the future.

As an exercise, let’s see what my thoughts would be when asked about a non-Apple product. I’ll imagine what they would have been prior to my owning Apple gear and then I’ll write down what they would be now.

The Product: Dell Latitude D530 laptop

A picture of the Dell Latitude D530 laptop

Pre-Apple

Wow! I cannot believe how inexpensive that is! It’s amazing how much bang for your buck you get now. I don’t know how Dell manage to do it. They’re practically giving them away. I’d feel really good if I’d bought that, knowing that I was getting that much power and the very latest version of Windows for so little outlay.

Now

My God, what an ugly laptop! That grey colour is horrible and it looks so utilitarian. I bet it’s got ports sprouting all over its exterior like warts. It’s bound to come with a huge power brick too. I see you can have it with Windows Vista, which in spite of the hardware will run like a dog and thrash the disk to death. Or you can have Windows XP, if you can live with the constant balloons popping up demanding attention and the sleep and resume issues.

It’s not just Dell computers that I now consider an affront to my eyes. Last week I was using an IBM Thinkpad on a training course that not only had a trackpad and a pointing nipple, but five buttons! Give me a multi-gesture trackpad with a large single button underneath anyday. Plus there were the usual assortment of slots, doors and ports. It even had a parallel printer port—has anyone used one of those since the mid-nineties? Worst of all was the dedicated Access IBM button. I mean, why would you want to?!

Lest anyone believe that I’ve completely lost my mind and am now a fully-paid up member of the Steve-one-button-is-all-you-need-Jobs brigade, I feel obliged to point out that I’ve never found Apple’s minimalist hardware aesthetic to be an issue. I simply don’t need any more bells and whistles than they give me. Everything else looks overdone by comparison. There’s no denying that something like an iPhone or an iPod touch does scream “look at me”, but that’s because
well-engineered elegant design is sadly rare in an age of constant product churn when the main differentiator is who can do it for the lowest cost.

I do think that like any cult Apple inspire fierce loyalty and a natural consequence of that is the rejection of non-Apple products. In answer to the original question of whether buying Apple gear turns you into a snob, I think that it probably amplifies any snobbish tendencies that you may already have, but perhaps more than anything it makes you aware of the deficiencies in other products through a heightened appreciation of good design. Is that so bad?

Happy Birthday LEGO!

Monday, 28 January 2008

Today marks the fiftieth anniversary of the invention of the humble LEGO brick. Apparently there are 2,400 different LEGO brick shapes and did you know that LEGO are the world’s largest manufacturer of tyres? LEGO was definitely one of my favourite toys as a child, particularly LEGO Technic. Who can forget playing with LEGO whilst kneeling down on the carpet wearing shorts, then standing up to find the imprints of eight studs in your kneecap where you’d knelt on a brick? At this point I feel obliged to point out to any American readers that the plural of LEGO is LEGO or LEGO bricks, not LEGOs! With that out of the way, let me share some of my memories of LEGO.

I loved getting LEGO sets for Christmas or birthdays. I think the first Technic set I owned was the 948 Go Kart, probably in 1979 or 1980. This was a cool set because it had a one cylinder piston engine at the back, the piston moving up and down as you pushed the go kart along! It also had working steering. No doubt this is tame stuff for today’s children who are used to Xbox 360s or PS3s, but at the time it was enough to spark my imagination and fuel my curiosity for how things work. I’m not sure the same can be said of console games where you’re led down a set path, however elaborate or flashy.

I remember being extremely envious of one of my friends when I was growing up because his elder brother had the 8860 Car Chassis. This set had a huge number of pieces and included amazing real world features such as a four cylinder engine mated to a two speed gearbox, adjustable seats and working rear suspension. My friend told me that this set was too complicated for people our age to be able to build, so it was with great pride that I proved him wrong when I eventually got the set for myself! This set was the first time I’d come across a differential gear and I can recall having a conversion with my Grandad—who was an engineer—about why it was needed.

A picture of the LEGO Technic 8860 Car Chassis set

At some point I got the new LEGO Technic excavator (set 8851) complete with pneumatics. This led me to retrofit height-adjustable pneumatic rear suspension to my Car Chassis, just like on a Citroën. A great thing about LEGO was that the build instructions leaflet always included instructions for at least one alternative model. In the case of the Car Chassis set this was an awesome drag bike. For the Go Kart it was a vulcanizer, although I had no idea what one of those was and I’m still not entirely sure.

As well as my numerous Technic sets, I also really liked the Space sets. To my eternal regret I missed out on owning the mega 928 Galaxy Explorer. My Dad took me to a toy shop and was going to buy it for me, when stupidly I made the impulse decision that I’d rather have a Corgi model of a dust cart instead! I wouldn’t have been as upset about my bad choice if I’d have known that decades later there’d be this thing called eBay where you could get all this stuff (apparently!)

Another thing I remember about LEGO was that you could get some nice little accessory sets, such as a set containing only cogs, gears and axles or sets that enabled you to motorise or add lighting to your creations. Some of the modern sets are incredibly sophisticated with fibre optics and programmable robotics. Somehow the blockiness of models made with LEGO didn’t seem to matter. I guess my childhood imagination must have smoothed things out. Probably the greatest thing about LEGO is that if you can imagine it then you can build it, provided you have the right bricks of course! I’m ashamed to admit for the very first time that I once stole a red 4 x 4 base plate whilst at a friend’s house because I needed it to complete a particular model I was making. Sorry Lisa!

Eventually I reached that age most of us reach where I had to give up playing with LEGO. I still enjoy building things, although now I make things out of blocks of software rather than blocks of ABS plastic. Unfortunately getting bits of software to play well is still nowhere near as easy as playing with LEGO was. In a feat of backwards compatibility that would make any software company envious, LEGO bricks from today still fit bricks made in 1958. So here’s to the next fifty years of LEGO!

AssetsGraphed Hits 200 Days Uptime

Friday, 28 December 2007

I’m pleased to report that my AssetsGraphed Ruby on Rails application has been running continuously for over two hundred days now, as the screenshot below taken from my installation of monit shows. Okay, so AssetsGraphed isn’t exactly getting hammered like Facebook, but this level of reliability supports my decision to choose Rails Machine for hosting my Rails applications. Their choice of running Xen-based VPSs on Linux would appear to be a wise one and I know that 37signals themselves are moving in this direction.

A screenshot of the monit system management page for AssetsGraphed, showing 201 days uptime

The next milestone will be a year’s continuous uptime—let’s hope that posting this isn’t the kiss of death that takes AssetsGraphed offline! Happy New Year everyone.

Rails Tip #11: Add Plugin Repositories

Monday, 17 December 2007

It’s something of a secret that you can configure the source code repositories the Rails plugin manager searches when you instruct it to install a plugin. This can be handy if you’re installing several plugins from the same author. Such as this one. Or this one.

To add a repository to the plugin manager:

./script/plugin source http://svn.techno-weenie.net/projects/plugins/

To remove a repository from the plugin manager:

./script/plugin unsource http://svn.techno-weenie.net/projects/plugins/

To list repositories registered with the plugin manager:

./script/plugin sources

To discover and list repositories without adding them:

./script/plugin discover -l

Purchasing Music Online, Microsoft Style

Sunday, 2 December 2007

My partner recently wanted to download a track from HMV Digital. The following is a true account of the process we had to go through before we could play the purchased music. By the way, the HMV Digital website only works with IE 6 or greater, so Firefox, Safari or Opera wasn’t an option. I know, party like it’s 1999!

  1. Click to download the purchased track.
  2. Tell IE to enable popups for the site.
  3. The HMV Download Manager opens.
  4. Tell IE to enable ActiveX controls for this window.
  5. The download starts but craps out after a few seconds with an obscure “DispInfo” error. I know that this sounds like COM-speak, but what’s a non-programmer to think?
  6. Switch to my clean installation of Windows XP running under Parallels on the Mac.
  7. Close the Desktop Cleanup Wizard balloon.
  8. Log in to the HMV Digital site. Click to download the purchased track.
  9. Close the Desktop Cleanup Wizard balloon again.
  10. Tell IE to enable popups for the site.
  11. The HMV Download Manager opens.
  12. Tell IE to enable ActiveX controls for this window.
  13. The download starts but craps out after a few seconds. It’s a different error this time: “The client does not have the DRM security update”.
  14. Do a Google search on the error text. End up at a Virgin Digital Music Help page. Follow the link to Microsoft to upgrade the security component.
  15. Click to download the purchased track. It works this time but is really slow because in the meantime Windows has decided to download this week’s updates.
  16. Click to install the updates.
  17. Click the balloon to see what updates Windows is installing.
  18. Windows Update prompts for a reboot. Ignore it because you haven’t transferred the downloaded track out of the virtual machine yet.
  19. Reboot Windows to finish installing the updates.
  20. Copy the track to the PC. Double-click it to play it.
  21. Windows Media Player 10 warns that some security components are missing. Click to install them.
  22. The installation fails.
  23. Double-click the file again. Nothing happens. Windows Media Player doesn’t start.
  24. Check for updates from within Windows Media Player. Update to the latest version.
  25. Windows Media Player can’t play the track because the licence is missing.
  26. Re-download the licence file from HMV.

Purchasing Music Online, Apple Style

  1. Open iTunes.
  2. Click the iTunes Store.
  3. Browse or search for what you want.
  4. Click Buy Song.

Bad Apple

Monday, 26 November 2007

One of the toughest tests of an operating system is how well it copes when disaster strikes and you have to somehow get your data back. Last weekend I found myself in this situation for the first time since I switched to using Mac OS X. I thought it worth recording the experience here simply for the selfish reason of having a note of what I did should the situation arise again.

The troubles started when I ran Apple’s Software Update application to upgrade my iMac to version 10.4.11 of Mac OS X Tiger. I foolishly assumed that this would be a no brainer since I’d already taken the big step of doing a clean install of Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard on my PowerBook. Incidentally, I’m conservatively holding off installing Leopard on the iMac until a Leopard-compatible version of the SuperDuper! system recovery software is available. Expect some views from me on Leopard once I’ve had a bit longer to live with it.

A picture of an emergency button

Unfortunately Software Update chose an operating system update as the moment to go wrong for me for the first time. Up until this point I’d never had the slightest whiff of trouble from it. It ran most of the update and then told me that it couldn’t complete and had put the installer package in the Trash. I did think that this was quite amusing, as if my Mac was telling me that the update I’d downloaded was rubbish and deserved to be filed accordingly! I retrieved the installer and ran it as a standalone update and got the same error. I think I rebooted at this point and was surprised to see that I did in fact appear to be running 10.4.11, complete with Safari 3.0 and its draggable tabs. I checked in the Software Update log but there was no mention of the update, so I guessed that it had merely crashed before it had chance to write to the log and do a general tidy up that left my operating system looking presentable and ready for use again.

Next I noticed that the rather important mach_kernel file was visible in the Finder in the root of my system disk. After a Google search I fixed that by doing:

sudo /Developer/Tools/SetFile -a V /mach_kernel

—And restarting the Finder. All appeared to be well until I plugged in my iPod and nothing happened apart from it starting charging. I knew that it needed charging so I wondered whether it simply didn’t have enough juice to sync. Unfortunately I was wrong and there then followed several resets and the forcing of FireWire Transfer Mode, all of which were to no avail. By now I was starting to get worried. At this point in the story I must admit that I did entertain guilty thoughts about how this could be a sign that I should replace my faithful but aging fourth generation iPod with a brand new iPod touch, but with a great effort of will I banished such thoughts. Beware the Reality Distortion Field!

As I couldn’t get the iPod to do anything I came to the conclusion that the only path open to me was to roll back my Mac to its last known good state, so I powered up my external hard disk and was somewhat alarmed to find that it wouldn’t mount. That was when I launched System Profiler and discovered that according to my Mac it didn’t have a FireWire bus. *#^% indeed!

The situation was getting quite serious now so I needed a plan. Fortunately I had two things on my side. Firstly, I had on my external hard disk a complete SuperDuper! copy of my iMac’s working 10.4.10 installation from only a few days before. The second thing I had going for me was that I had a Mac, which makes it really easy to start up from other disks or generally shuffle the entire OS about.

A picture of the Disk Utility application

I swapped the connection to the external drive from FireWire to USB and booted from my Tiger install DVD. Next I fired up Disk Utility and dragged the external drive icon to the source field and the icon for my system disk to the destination field. I clicked the Restore button and waited rather a long time as over 120 GB was copied across. There was one heart-stopping moment as I got an obscure error code right at the very end of the restore process. There was nothing to lose by now so I ejected the DVD and rebooted. My iMac took longer than usual to start but it did come back up and I logged in and to my absolute joy found that I was back to using 10.4.10.

However, it wasn’t all plain sailing as I discovered when I started Safari. Although it was back to Safari 2.0, all of my bookmarks were missing and the Import Bookmarks menu item was permanently disabled. I’d had enough by now, so I decided to run Software Update to get 10.4.11 again, with a vow that if that didn’t work then I’d wipe the disk and install Leopard from scratch. Happily, Software Update worked perfectly this time and the upgrade to Safari magically restored all my bookmarks.

My iMac was now back to rude health apart from a niggling little problem of some UNIX-y folders such as /etc, /var and /tmp being visible in the Finder. Perhaps they should have been made invisible right at the end of the restore process when it crashed. I was able to resolve that issue with another Google search followed by entering the next line into a Terminal window:

defaults write com.apple.Finder AppleShowAllFiles NO

—Relaunch the Finder by Option-right-clicking on its Dock icon and the job’s a good ‘un.

Overall I’d have to rate the Mac disaster recovery experience as being on a par with the rest of the Mac experience i.e. generally well thought-out and pretty painless. Certainly I’d say that SuperDuper! is a must.

Incidentally, the hairiest disaster recovery experience I ever had was a few years ago when my installation of Windows 2000 went badly wrong and wouldn’t let me log on, because the driver letters had got mixed up. I fixed that one by installing a parallel copy of Windows 2000 and then using regedt32.exe to load the registry of the broken installation. I was then able to edit the GUIDs that Windows uses internally to represent drives and partitions. At the time it felt like the task required a similar level of concentration and calm that you would imagine for dismantling a bomb! Fortunately I didn’t break into a sweat this time around.

Emergency Button photo credit: Matt Davis.

FogBugz World Tour

Monday, 12 November 2007

I went to a great gig in London last Friday with my good buddy John Conners. In a bizarre twist on the traditional format for these things, it was actually a presentation on project management software for software teams, rather than a music gig. If you think that sounds boring, then you’d be right. Fortunately, the person giving the presentation was none other than A-list celebrity software blogger Joel Spolsky of Joel on Software fame. Joel and Fog Creek Software co-founder Michael Pryor were in town to promote the latest version (6.0) of FogBugz, which increasingly embodies Joel’s philosophies on different aspects of the software development process.

The venue was the conference centre at the British Library, which was jam-packed with geeks—mainly male, it has to be said. Joel gave his presentation which included a FogBugz demo, then the floor was opened to questions and finally Joel and Michael stuck around afterwards to answer questions on a more informal basis from the throngs of developers that surrounded them.

The most interesting new feature in FogBugz 6.0 is Evidence Based Scheduling (EBS). Joel himself would probably characterise it as a hand-wavy sounding feature, but from watching his demonstration it actually looks practical and useful. What it boils down to is this: FogBugz makes it as painless as possible for developers to record what they’re working on and then over time it uses statistical modelling techniques to generate fancy charts that tell you a percentage probably of when your team will ship, or how accurate individual developers have been at estimating their work. Joel blogged about the feature in depth a while ago.

FogBugz 6.0 also includes a handy wiki feature that serves as a central project documentation repository. What’s interesting to me about how they’ve implemented this is that it only has a WYSIWYG editing mode i.e. you can’t get at the markup that’s generated under the covers. I suspect that Fog Creek have learned from their experience with CityDesk here, which had all sorts of problems when you switched back and forth between the editor view and the markup view. Joel actually touched on this during the Q & A when someone asked if WYSIWYG is a leaky abstraction: the short answer is that it is.

What I found most useful from a FogBugz point of view was getting a leg-up on how to use the software effectively. I’ve been using the hosted version for a while for AssetsGraphed, but I knew that I wasn’t getting the most out of it. I had trouble coming to terms with the FogBugz model whereby everything is essentially a case within the system, even e-mail. That’s all a lot clearer now and I shall shortly be hooking up the AssetsGraphed contact screen to FogBugz, so that any feedback I receive from users is properly categorised and managed. After that I’ll hook up the crash reporting system, which means that new cases will get created automatically on those rare occasions when the application crashes, instead of the present system which simply e-mails me the details. The beauty of it being that FogBugz is smart enough to recognise when incoming crash details are the same as previous crash details and so won’t create lots of duplicate cases, but rather will append to an existing case.

I’ve also developed an appreciation of what a sophisticated AJAX application FogBugz now is! I think this is something of a well-kept secret because FogBugz doesn’t advertise its use of AJAX in a flashy way, it just makes the experience of using the software faster and more pleasant. One feature that I certainly was aware of from the previous version is the great keyboard support, which is far superior to any other web application I’ve seen. Just as one thing Microsoft got right with Windows from the start was the ability to drive the user interface using only a keyboard, you can get around FogBugz in the same manner.

Joel turned out to be exactly how I expected, which is to say an entertaining and interesting speaker who answered everyone’s questions with patience and charm. Talking of questions, I was a bit surprised that some people used the occasion to glean information that can be easily found on Fog Creek’s website. I guess there were quite a few people there who wanted to find out about FogBugz straight from the source rather than attending because they’re JoS fans. We certainly did find out all about the latest version of FogBugz and very impressive it is too. My only slight disappointment with the event was that there was no FogBugz World Tour 2007 merchandise for sale, such as T-shirts with a list of tour dates on the back. Not very rock ‘n’ roll, Joel!

1982

Saturday, 27 October 2007

Time for a quick quiz. What do the following have in common?

  • The Compact Disc
  • Mark Thatcher gets lost
  • The Mary Rose

If you answered “the year 1982” then maybe you remembered those events from the time, or perhaps you just guessed from the title of this post. A bit of a give-away, that. My main memories of that year also include:

  • The Falklands War
  • The Sinclair ZX Spectrum
  • Channel Four
  • The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole, Aged 13¾
  • The Ford Sierra

Why am I telling you this? It’s because I can’t quite believe it’s twenty five years ago and specifically, it’s a quarter of a century this month since my father took me to the Birmingham International Motor Show, where we were party to the UK launch of the Ford Sierra: Man and Machine in Perfect Harmony. Much more on that later.

I don’t remember a great deal about 1982 as I was only eight years old, but I recall watching live television showing the Mary Rose being raised from the depths of The Solent, where she’d rested since 1545. Specifically, I remember the TV commentary being a bit more exciting than the pictures, which as far as I could tell showed huge yellow cranes lifting up a few old planks of wood. Fortunately, I have a better developed sense of history and occasion now!

Channel Four Television launched in November 1982, a fact that only comes to mind because it’s referenced in that hilarious book of the year, Sue Townsend’s “The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole, Aged 13¾”. I remember reading the fictional diary whilst staying with an uncle and auntie and for some truly bizarre reason I spent the first half of the book thinking that Adrian Mole was a girl! Anyway, having a fourth UK terrestrial television channel was a big deal, because this was at a time when television was only on in the evenings—if I remember correctly, apart from school programmes you got the test card during the day (breakfast television didn’t start in the UK until 1983).

My memory of The Falklands War is simply of it being on the news a lot and of doing a school project on it whilst it was going on. Predictably, it seemed like an exciting event to a young boy at the time. I don’t remember having much of a sense of the horror and suffering of it, although perhaps I did and those memories have faded.

I probably saw the newfangled Compact Disc demonstrated on Tomorrow’s World at some point that year, although I didn’t actually get to hold, own or listen to one until 1990! I was still impressed though. I wish the BBC would bring Tomorrow’s World back as I used to really enjoy watching it, even if most of the inventions and breakthroughs they showed didn’t end up making it into our everyday lives. Perhaps it’s because of the age I was that the early 1980s seemed like a very exciting time, technologically. We seemed to be on the verge of some golden new technology age, the likes of which hadn’t been seen since the 1950s and 60s. Digital technology was starting to come through with digital audio and fibre optic cabling and with computers starting to appear in homes.

I suspect that like many households, our first home computer—if you ignore a Binatone TV Master games console from the late 70s: were they even computers?—made it through the door under the guise of being able to help with the household accounts or being good for John’s homework. Naturally our 16K Sinclair ZX Spectrum soon earned its keep as a games machine!

My memory of the arrival of the little rubber-keyed black box of magic is that for some reason my Dad ordered it directly from Sinclair Research in Cambridge rather than buying it from a shop. I think the parcel may have come on a Friday and we spent hours that night trying to set the damn thing up correctly! There was no monitor, you connected it to your TV which had to be tuned to the computer signal. I think that may have been the problem. Fortunately we eventually got it all working and were able to load the bundled Psion “Horizons” cassette of demo programs and were soon playing the “Brick the Wall” game, which you probably know as “Breakout”. There was some crazy stuff on that tape, I can tell you. Such as a biorhythms program—still not entirely sure what they are—and a program that simulated population growth in rabbits! Good times.

No one born after about 1985 can possibly appreciate the sheer excitement and feeling that you’re living in the future that came from having a home computer in the early 1980s, in the same way that I probably can’t appreciate those thoughts and feelings arising as a result of building an Altair or owning an Apple ][ in the 1970s.

Some time in the autumn of 1982 my Dad asked, apropos of nothing, if I’d like to go to the forthcoming Motor Show, a biannual event then held at the huge Birmingham NEC complex. Although I don’t think I was particularly into cars, I did have an interest in things shiny and mechanical so I eagerly agreed. The day arrived and we hit the road early. I think it was on this first Motor Show trip that I sat in the passenger seat and decided to break up a dull motorway journey by giving the thumbs-up sign to any lorry drivers that we overtook. Surprisingly, they all cheerfully reciprocated. You should try it some time. On second thoughts, it probably works best if you’re eight or under!

This day at the Motor Show is possibly one of my most treasured childhood memories, so you’ll have to indulge me whilst I write about it at length for a bit. My overriding memory is that I found it incredibly exciting. For lots of reasons—a boys’ day out with my Dad, the overwhelming excitement of going to my first Motor Show and the fact that it marked the British debut of the new Ford Sierra.

It’s difficult for me to convey just how radical the Sierra was when it was launched. This was the car that replaced twenty years of the Ford Cortina, a favourite with both fleet and family buyers in Britain. By 1982 the Cortina was looking pretty tired. It was still a best seller but by all accounts it wasn’t a great drive and the technology was pretty agricultural. In spite of which, Britain was still buying masses of them.

By contrast, the new Sierra looked like nothing else around, aside from the even more radical Audi 100 which came out at the same time. I think the Sierra was more important though because it was a mass market rather than executive car. Ford put on a huge splash to introduce the Sierra to the vital UK market at the Birmingham show. I remember that they had a massive stand that was packed with promotional material such as videos and cutaway displays as well as plenty of the actual cars. Undoubtedly the Ford hype machine was in top gear but it was very exciting to me at the time and it must also have been pretty stimulating for the adults present. It’s not often that something genuinely sensational comes along that marks a complete break with what’s gone before. I remember being blown away by the sheer effort that Ford must have put into their new car, because from reading the launch brochure it seemed like it was breaking ground in so many new areas, although principally in fuel-saving aerodynamics, a direct consequence of the fuel crises of the 1970s.

A montage of pictures showing the Ford Sierra in the wind tunnel at Cologne

It’s hard to believe now, but people used to stop in the street and stare when they saw a new Sierra on the road, as if it were a spaceship. Sure, the Sierra had four wheels, an engine and a body but it had impact resistant, moulded aerodynamic bumpers made from polycarbonite, when other cars made do with a bent bit of steel bolted onto the front and back. It had an ergonomically designed dashboard with a centre console that was angled towards the driver like in a BMW, with controls that were arranged in logical zones. I remember that the brochure proudly proclaimed that the steering wheel, pedals and driver’s seat were all aligned, whereas in most cars they’re slightly askew. I read somewhere that the design brief was to “make the driver feel important”.

Ford were proud to show off their high technology in the Sierra brochure. It was all about how Ford’s computers had helped design the car and how robots would build it. There was talk of how Finite Element Analysis had enabled the car to be built using less metal and how those same computers that had produced the Sierra had helped NASA to design the space shuttle, which had had its maiden flight only a year earlier.

The Sierra was lighter, roomier, more fuel efficient, quieter, safer and much more aerodynamic than its predecessor. In fact, when new the Sierra was 21% more aerodynamic than the class average. By contrast, modern cars tend to be bigger and heavier than the cars they replace. Some of this is undoubtedly down to much tougher safety legislation and market forces but I can’t help thinking that sometimes the car makers just aren’t trying as hard. The only car in modern times that has struck me as outstanding in the same way that the Sierra did was another Ford: the original Focus. Even then, it was a brilliant complete package with original styling, rather than the major technology-driven step ahead for all cars that the Sierra represented.

I came away from that Motor Show feeling inspired. In those days I used to love drawing and I remember spending hours afterwards churning out endless pictures of the Sierra. I think it must have been about that time that I got my first inkling of what I wanted to be when I grew up: a car designer! The trend continued and Dad and I went to subsequent Motor Shows—1984: radical new aerodynamic Vauxhall Astra!—and even the Motorfairs held on odd-numbered years at Earls Court in London. However, none of these shows seemed quite as good as the first time. In fact, they seemed to get worse each year in the sense that the car manufacturers didn’t seem to put as much effort into their stands, or maybe it was just because I was older and less susceptible to marketing hype.

In a fit of nostalgia I recently used eBay to track down a few issues of Car Magazine from that era just to satisfy myself that this car really was big news in the motoring world and had not gained extra significance in the over-active imagination of an impressionable eight year old. I’m pleased to report that my memory doesn’t fail me and that the Sierra really was big news for 1982. October 1982’s Car had “Sierra Shock: It really is a good car” on the cover and a glowing report inside. From reading that issue it’s clear that everyone thought that the Sierra was going to be a massive sales success and maintain or increase Ford’s 35% share of the British car market. Of course it didn’t turn out that way, a turn of events that I took surprisingly personally at the time, for I couldn’t understand why seemingly nobody else understood what an exciting and brilliant car the Sierra was!

A montage of pictures of the Ford Sierra

Unfortunately when it went on sale the Sierra was a bit too radical for the British public and Ford initially had trouble shifting them. The car was soon nicknamed the jelly mould and the early models had a well-publicised stability problem in cross-winds. If you look carefully you’ll see that all but the very earliest Sierras have little plastic “ears” behind their rear three-quarter lights which Ford fitted to cure the problem, at the slight expense of adding extra drag. The Ford sales organisation went into overdrive and the introduction of sporty models to the range such as the XR4i and later the infamous Sierra Cosworth helped to lift the car’s image and sales figures, although it never did the business in Britain that the Cortina had.

By 1987 the Sierra was given a mid-life facelift and no longer looked like the odd one out, for the style of aerodynamic design it had pioneered was now mainstream. In the early 1990s it was finally replaced by the Mondeo, a thoroughly modern, competent and boring car. It was telling that Ford decided to drop the Sierra name, as they were haunted by the spectre of its relative failure for years afterwards and following the equally radical Granada/Scopio retreated back into conservative design for much of the 1980s. Fortunately they found their bold streak again in the 1990s with “New Edge” designs such as the Ka, Puma and Focus.

People who know me may be surprised to read all this car talk, for the supreme irony is that I can’t drive! I guess I’ve always been more interested in cars as technology, engineering or object d’art than as a personal means of transportation. I think I appreciate cars in a more abstract way now, when the reality is environmental damage, traffic jam misery, speed cameras and increasing ownership and running costs. However, if I were to come across a pristine silver 2.3 Sierra Ghia on a Y plate then I might be tempted to buy it. For posterity’s sake you understand…

I can’t remember the last Motor Show I went to with my Dad—I think it was in the mid-1990s—but as you’ve read I can certainly still remember the first one we went to in October 1982. Sadly I wasn’t able to reminisce about all this with the one person I shared the experience with, as my father died early last year. When memories are the most personal thing that you have left of somebody it makes you realise how precious they are and how soon and easily the present fades into years ago.

Front Row Slow

Saturday, 27 October 2007

In Mac OS X you can slow down some of the animation effects by holding down the Shift key whilst activating them. For example, minimising a window or activating Exposé. I just tried it with the Front Row keyboard shortcut of Command + Escape but it didn’t work. However, it does work if using the key combination again to return to the Desktop. Weird!

Life With A Mac

Thursday, 4 October 2007

Hello! It’s John here. John Conners to be precise (from John’s Adventures fame). Way back in March John (Topley) wrote an article on my site titled ‘The Case For The Mac‘. At the time I was a lifelong Windows user (well, since Windows 3.1) and for as long as I’d known him John had been trying to persuade me to buy a Mac. As you can see from John’s eloquently written article, he made a very good case. Fast forward to April (only a few weeks later) and I wrote about the fact that I’d finally caved in and bought a Mac - a Macbook to be precise. At the time I was smitten since I’d just bought the thing and was overcome by the amazing styling and classy touches.

So here I am five months so later and I thought it was about time I wrote about my experiences being a proper Mac user. And what better place to do that than the blog of the man who made it all happen?

John Conners and his Mac

First of all, in true John Conners style, I went all out. I gave my Windows laptop to my wife, blitzed my desktop PC at home and that left me with only my Macbook to do my web surfing, emailing, Windows software development (more about that later) and any other computer related activities. And you know what? I’ve never looked back!

Moving from Windows to Mac OS X was a little tricky at first. I had to work out where everything was and what all the keyboard shortcuts were, but in no time I was moving around like a pro. I didn’t find myself missing the overly cluttered Windows taskbar and Start button one bit. I love being able to SSH onto my web server rather than going through a Windows app. I love the look and feel of Mac OS X, it seems to be much less cluttered than Windows and it makes intelligent choices about what you’re trying to do rather than badgering you with endless wizards filled with stupid questions. Being able to see all the windows for a current application at the same time (via F10) or all applications (F9) has now become second-nature and when I’m on a PC I really miss it. There are a hundred other things I could cite but in short, once I got used to the different operating system I started to love it and any time spent on a PC felt incredibly frustrating, as though it was trying to get in my way.

My wife’s less-than-perfect experience of her Vista laptop randomly restarting itself for ‘critical’ updates and it frequently failing to connect to our wi-fi unless I restarted the networking was in contrast to my stress-free life with my Mac where everything just works. In only a few weeks I had turned into one of these “you should buy a Mac” people just like John - evangelising Macs at every opportunity. (So far I’ve managed to get one friend to buy one - result!).

Having been constrained to the more business-oriented Windows machines I was suddenly free to be creative. I could take a bunch of photos from a holiday, turn them into a slide-show, put them on a DVD that my father’s DVD player could play. I could write and sing my own score without it sounding terrible (GarageBand has some effects that make even the worst singing voice sound reasonable), I could edit video clips and put them as a chapter on the DVD and do a host of other cool things. I could create and order an surprisingly high quality photobook (in fact our wedding photo album was made in iPhoto and looks fantastic). It’s possible to do all these things on a Windows box but you’d have to track down and buy the software, it would either cost a fortune or integrate poorly - whereas it all comes as standard on a Mac and works seamlessly together while actually making it fun to do so. I shudder to use marketingspeak but I really felt “empowered” for the first time in my computing life. And I still do.

I’ve bought a couple of books on the subject of writing software for the Mac. It’s a completely different language and toolkit to what I’ve used before but it seems sensibly organised and I’m enjoying learning something new - along with the user interface design guidelines which are quite different to the Windows ones. I’ve always been keen to try and create usable software and I feel that Mac software takes usability to a higher level.

As I mentioned before I still do my Windows development (plug: John’s Background Switcher) on the Mac using VMWare Fusion. Since my Macbook uses an Intel processor, Windows runs almost as quickly inside Mac OS X as it would do on its own. I have no problems at all using Visual Studio inside my Mac (which is still the best development tool I’ve ever used) and it means I get the best of both worlds.

I have an office in my house that I used to use whenever I went on-line. However now I just fire up my Mac while sitting on the sofa in the lounge and do what I need to do. From pressing the power button to firing up a browser takes less than 30 seconds - compared to several minutes on my wife’s Windows laptop (a couple minutes more if it won’t connect to the wi-fi). I think it’s fair to say that I love my Mac. From its beautiful curves to its sleek shape to the feel and sound of the keyboard. I know it’s wrong to feel love for an inanimate object but I do. I’d never say something like that about a Windows machine and I’d never go back to having one as my primary machine.

So thanks John. You showed me the light and turned me into an even bigger Mac fanboy than you! :)